Friday, August 28, 2009

Bibi, Begum aur Patni

Well, I've had a mammoth film viweing day of three classic hindi films depicting the social life of Indians in three different periods.

1. Sahib Bibi aur Ghulam (1962)
2. Shatranj ke Khiladi (1977)
3. Katha (1983)

Although Sahib Bibi and Shatranj were set in a time older than their year of release, I found certain similarities and observations on the role of men and women in Indian society in all three of them.

Sahib Bibi aur Ghulam: Meena Kumari's character is of a woman who is married to a rich landlord of Calcutta (pre-independence) who is given to heavy drinking and womanising at the kotha. But she is not like the other women in the house who quietly ignore these antics of their husbands and as according to her sister-in-law even support it as a 'manly' activity. She wants to spend time with her husband, or what else does she have to do the entire day! Her Husband is like a God, and she must serve him at all times, so much that she will drink liquor and sing for him (blasphemy in those days). I really liked her performance, it was powerful and conveyed the dichotomy of her situation very well. The song, "na jao sayian" is haunting with her drunk presence and Alvi's camera movements. But why does she have a deep devotion for her husband who clearly does not care for her? Was it a survival technique for women in those days who could not be economically or socially liberated? Or was it in some sense a powerful effort on her part to claim her husband back to where he belonged?
But there is only a slight retribution for her at the end, as her husband lies bedridden and she drunk....an ironic role reversal.
Waheedas's character on the other hand is of a woman who is also taking charge of her life, even though it is within archaic child marriage rules.

Shatranj ke Khiladi: Shabana Azmi is Sanjeev Kumar's wife who has clearly lost interest in her to his chess board. Here too, Azmi's character tries to connive Kumar's character into spending time with her. She is desperate and even sexually deprived. But the man here is not interested in being physical. On the other hand, Jaffrey's wife (a robust Fareeda Jalal) is cheating on him with his nephew and clearly expressing her sexuality. I found these to be brilliant characterisations.

Katha: Deepti Naval's character is easily attracted to the "bad-boy" Farooque Sheikh. While on the other hand Naseeruddin is never able to express his love for her till the last moment nor does Deepti's character guage his emotions. But what struck me was when Farooque's character asks her if she is 'modern and liberated'. As soon as she admits she is (hesitatingly), he finds it easy to canoodle and get her into bed. But even after facing humiliation from him, Naseer's character accepts her in the end as who she is.

All in all......I'm trying to place how women are portrayed in Indian Cinema through the ages. Why is a woman portrayed to be begging for a man's affection? And yet, they are infinitely free and powerful. It says something about our patriachal society, which has been, and still is going strong, if not directly but subtly.

6 comments:

the latin sardar said...

This post had me thinking a bit and then I realized I have a lot to say on this topic. So don't mind if I post a rather detailed version of my thought in the next remark.

Joe Pinto said...

My dear Harman,

How did I miss this wonderful post? You have reviews of two great oldies and one modern film.

If you liked Sahib, Bibi aur Gulam, then you must see ALL the films directed by Guru Dutt. Then you will get his portrayal of women in those days, which may help you to gain insights into how women lived and behaved in the 30s and 40s.

But you are absolutely on the dot about one thing: once a married man knows that his wife can earn and take care of herself, he is careful about his behaviour.

Yet, women have a long way to go. And I hope with the guts and perseverance of thinking women like you, they will make great strides. Keep up your thinking and writing. I too have a daughter (Pallavi Joseph Kalpana on FB) who thinks like you do.

Also have a look at the blog by Kajal Iyer: she too loves to think for herself. You should also send the link of your blog to another SIMC student, who's your senior -- Smriti Mudgal, now in CNBC-Awaaz.

Smriti is one of the most perceptive of my students and has deep insights into the issues you have raised in these reviews.

Peace and love,
- Joe.

Harman said...

Sir, thanks for your comment. As always, your comments and opinions are very valuable. I saw some films of Guru Dutt in symbi itself, and i feel it is a good time to revisit those too. It is interesting to observe the perspective one develops after watching some films, and making new observations as opposed to when u saw the film as a student in college. I remember watching Katha in the 90's, but I understand its social implications better now. After watching these three films, I saw Ray's Charulata - which is another masterpiece not just of filmmaking but of characterisations of men and women.

Joe Pinto said...

My dear Harman,

With your eye for pictures, a film-maker you must watch is Ritwik Ghatak. His view of women in Meghe Dhaka Tara (1960) is a contrast to Guru Dutt or Satyajit Ray.

Ritwik's greatest commercial success is the script for Madhumati (1958), directed by Bimal Roy and starring Dilip Kumar and Vyjantimala.

Other film-makers like Ghatak include Mrinal Sen, Adoor Gopalakrishnan. Now this material is available in good DVD libraries. Also become a member of a film society.

You should also plan to stay in Pune during May to attend the annual Film Appreciation course.

Peace and love,
- Joe.

Joe Pinto said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Harman said...

Sir, thanks for your reccomendations. I attended the one-month Film Appreciation course conducted by NFAI/FTII in the year 2007. It was one of the best learning experiences of my life. Its there that I first saw Ghatak's work through Meghe Dhake Tara....and I do want to watch more films made by him. Same goes with Adoor, who is someone I've missed out on.